Sunday, March 30, 2008

No need to cheat: new Internet resource helps students write their own essays

A Sussex-based English tutor, Grant Hudson, has set up an internet service to advise students on essay writing in an attempt to combat plagiarism.

"Plagiarism has become a plague and one which the teaching profession seems powerless to control [where] writing an essay was no more than an exercise in cut and paste," writes Peter Williams, editor of Information World Review (Europe's leading newspaper for the information industry) in a recent IWR blog.

The Inner Circle Writers' Group offers several different services to help students with school and university English essays so that they will be able to avoid the impulse to cheat and buy essays from unscrupulous companies.

"Services are available now whereby someone will write an essay for a school or university student on demand," Mr. Hudson said. "All the student has to do is send in an essay question and someone else does all the work. They charge a lot of money, but some students pay because they worry about their own abilities to reach certain grades. This is against any school's or university's regulations, and a student who makes use of such a service is risking expulsion."

"As well as being unethical, expensive and lazy, having someone else actually write your essay for you is pointless, as the education you're receiving serves no purpose."

Though plagiarism has become much easier with the rise of the World Wide Web, the official examining boards in England have, until recently, only been able to discover less than one percent of students actually copying essays directly from other sources. Now, new software enables universities, in particular, to track down the originals and so catch the plagiarist.

"The problem is that new companies, often based overseas, have found a way around this by offering to write the essay from scratch for the student, which is very difficult to trace," says Mr. Hudson, who also works as the Head of the English Department at Greenfields School in Forest Row, East Sussex. "I decided to tackle this by setting up the Inner Circle Writers' Group which helps with essay coaching, teaching students by e-mail how to write better essays for much less than these other companies charge. Hopefully, students will turn to services like mine and learn to improve their own skills rather than panicking and seeking what seems like an easy way out which could lead to disaster and a wasted education."

Website: http://www.innercirclewritersgroup.co.uk/

Friday, March 28, 2008

New digital archive puts the papers that made copyright history online

Some of the most important copyright documents ever written are being made available online for the first time, reflecting growing public interest in authorial rights in the wake of the internet revolution.

Original papers charting the contributions of thinkers such as Machiavelli, Martin Luther, John Locke, Daniel Defoe, Immanuel Kant, Wordsworth, Balzac and Victor Hugo to the development of copyright law will be available through the Primary Sources on Copyright History Project, which is being launched in London this week.

The website, http://www.copyrighthistory.org/, will offer users anywhere in the world the chance to examine more than 10,000 pages of rare legal papers, some of which date back to the invention of the printing press itself. It has been compiled by an international team of lawyers and historians, led by experts from the University of Cambridge and Bournemouth University.

Many of the documents, which include writings by some of the greatest scholars of the past 500 years, have until now been stashed away in obscure libraries all over the world. The new digital resource will mean that for the first time anyone who wants to read them can do so at the click of a button.

The website's creators say the resource reflects growing public concern about copyright issues raised, in particular, by the advent of the internet revolution.

"Copyright law used to be a topic that only affected authors and the industries that exploited their works," Professor Lionel Bently, from the University Cambridge and one of the project's general editors, said.

"Today, everyone who uses a computer, operates a web page, accesses online materials, or downloads music from the internet needs to be wary of copyright rules. While in the past copies were made by the exploiters – publishers, broadcasters or the film and record industries – now they are being made by individuals on computers, in their offices or at home."

The documents in the collection will be available both as facsimile images and in transcribed and translated formats. The earliest is Johannes of Speyer's monopoly, awarded to the German craftsman by the Venetian Signoria in 1469, and the first known record of a printing privilege granted by a European government. From there, the history of copyright law in Britain, France, Italy, Germany and the United States is traced up to the 1886 Berne Convention – which broke through the national boundaries restricting copyright law.

Notable among the British papers is the original parchment copy of the Statute of Anne of 1710, the world's first general copyright law, and a model for much subsequent legislation. The Statute granted authors and their publishers an exclusive term of 14 years ( today the duration of copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years ). In order to receive copyright protection, all books had to be registered at Stationers' Hall, London, the livery hall of the ancient guild of printers where the digital archive will be formally opened on Wednesday ( 19 March ).

Users can also examine Martin Luther's indignant Admonition To The Printers, written in 1525 after one of his manuscripts was stolen by a typesetter, who then reaped the profit of having it printed overseas. The father of Protestantism compares his actions to those of "highwaymen and thieves", adding: "God will see to it that the profit you make on this will just suffice for you to smear your shoes with it!"

The archive also features prints and privileges by the German Renaissance artist Albrecht Dürer, William Hogarth's intervention that led to the 1735 Engraver's Copyright Act, the philosopher Denis Diderot's letter on behalf of the Paris book trade ( 1763 ), and the constitutional clause of the United States ( 1789 ) that gave Congress the power to legislate in the fields of patents and copyright in order "to promote the progress of science and the useful arts".

The editors hope the digital archive will not just prove useful to scholars and legal historians, but inform legislative debates, such as the Government's current review of exceptions to copyright law, and the push by record company executives to extend the European copyright term in sound recordings from 50 to 95 years.

History suggests that legislators should be wary when industrial interests become concerned with the "natural right of authors over the products of their mental labour", as the publishers expressed their argument for the 1710 Statute, and in the subsequent "Battle of the Booksellers". More often than not, this argument has been shown to be a smokescreen for market control.

"History provides useful insights into why copyright was thought to be desirable and how it has expanded," said general editor Professor Martin Kretschmer of Bournemouth University. "The primary sources in this collection show that there are many more ways to reconfigure copyright norms than surface in current debate. The regulation of an information society quite urgently needs a wider perspective."

The archive can be pre-viewed at http://copyright-project.law.cam.ac.uk/. Its permanent web address is: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/.

Judge Dismisses Copyright Infringement Complaint Against iParadigms

A Virginia judge has issued a summary judgment regarding his dismissal of a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by four high school students against iParadigms over the use of the students' written works in the Turnitin plagiarism detection service.

The judge stated that iParadigms' use of archived student works to assess originality of newly-submitted papers constitutes a fair use under US copyright law and is therefore not copyright infringement. In addition, he states that such use "provides a substantial public benefit through the network of institutions using Turnitin."

iParadigms' CEO John Barrie said, "The Turnitin service was created because of the pressing educational need from institutions to help students learn to produce original written work -- especially in our 'cut and paste' digital world. The judge has validated that our service is able to do so without infringing the copyrights of students' work."

U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton said that, "though iParadigms makes a profit in providing this service to educational institutions, its use of student works adds 'a further purpose or different character' to the works." Such "transformative" works do not violate fair use. Further, because student works become part of the database against which other students' work is compared, Turnitin helps protect the papers from being exploited by others who might profitably claim them as their own work.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Don't Sign Your Refund Check Over to Malware Writers

With tax season coming down to the wire, most American households are preparing to fire up their web browsers in order to use one of the main online tax preparation software programs in order to begin the dreary, but necessary, task of filing tax documentation for the year.

Filing tax returns is one of the yearly tasks American households must add to their already-busy schedules. Without proper network security, households risk having not only their networks attacked, but also risk losing personal information. Some think that having a basic antivirus solution is enough to prevent intrusions. Others may not even be aware that their computer could be at risk. To help American households prevent identity theft, BitDefender is offering valuable tips to follow this tax season.

For most, filing taxes has become a routine. Few pause to contemplate the consequence of exposing all their information to the Net -- and with the multitude of viruses, worms, phishing attacks, hacking attempts and other assorted nefarious acts being perpetrated on the Web these days, data and identity theft are not as remote of a possibility as people would like to assume.

"As cybercriminals learn and employ new ways to attempt to steal financial and personal information, consumers need to be aware that their network could be at risk," said Bogdan Dumitru, BitDefender CTO. "Especially during tax season -- when more and more people are turning to the Internet to help file their tax returns -- it is especially important for households to take extra steps ensuring their network security."

There are simple ways to protect your family's identity and financial information, while still doing your taxes from the comfort of your own home:

1. Sweep your system before you start. Make sure your system is clean -- a full system scan with a good antivirus should be enough. You can schedule this to be done overnight, so you don't waste any time.

2. Type the URL into your browser. Phishing websites can be very convincing -- don't follow a link to the IRS website, write the address (www.irs.gov) in your browser's address bar yourself.

3. Use an antispam filter and an anti-phishing web filter. Using an antispam and an anti-phishing web filter avoids receiving phishing e-mails or being directed to phishing websites. Good security software includes both.

4. Disable ActiveX and JavaScript in your browser. If you happen to visit a malicious website while doing your taxes online, this lessens the chance of getting infected.

5. Don't send tax-related documents or do tax-related browsing over WiFi. Currently deployed wireless encryption technologies are known to be flawed -- an attacker can eavesdrop on and decrypt all traffic flowing through an access point. Be especially wary about sending through a public location -- places like coffee shops are sometimes "sniffed" upon on a permanent basis by bad guys.

6. Know the company you are filing your e-taxes with. Do they have a valid address? Does anyone answer the phone? Have you dealt with them in the past? Just about anyone can put up a storefront on the web and claim to be able do your taxes -- not all who do are legit.

In recent years, more people have turned to the Internet to file the tax documentation, research and shop. As the use of the Internet increases, opportunities for cybercriminals to hack into their victim's network arise. Taking a few necessary precautions will ensure that American households are securing their network and preventing the loss of valuable data.

Source: http://www.bitdefender.com/

Myxer Launches PROTECT Copyright Protection Program for Rights Holders

Myxer, the leader in ad-supported mobile content, announced details of its PROTECT program, a powerful framework designed to address the concerns of copyright holders in the emerging new mobile economy. As one of the mobile industry's leading service providers, Myxer is working proactively with content owners, such as record labels, film and television studios, to give them unprecedented visibility into and control over the flow of content through the Myxer platform.

Building on the company's longstanding commitment to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), the PROTECT program is the culmination of months of technical, legal, and market development efforts. Taking inspiration from leading rights-administration systems, such as eBay's VeRO, PROTECT is a comprehensive, proactive, and powerful tool for content owners in the digital age. Embracing the same principals of openness and simplicity that drive Myxer's core business, PROTECT gives content owners open access to content administration tools enabling direct and immediate results based on the DMCA framework.

Website: http://www.myxer.com/

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Slate Launches Law Blog

Slate, the daily online magazine, today launches a legal blog featuring some of the most prominent voices in law. "Convictions," the law blog, will include daily commentary from a wide range of legal professionals, including Slate's Jurisprudence columnists Dahlia Lithwick and Emily Bazelon and top litigators and law professors across the country.

"The popularity in our Jurisprudence column made it clear to us that readers view Slate as a destination for smart, engaging legal commentary. By launching a law blog, we're able to post immediate reactions to legal cases and headlines, providing an accessible source for legal discourse from a wide-range of qualified experts," said Jacob Weisberg, Slate's Editor. "‘Convictions' is the newest of what we hope to be many more legal features across the site."

Slate approached Phillip Carter, regular contributor on legal and military affairs to Slate, to serve as editor of the blog. Carter practices law with McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP in New York City, in the areas of government contracts and litigation. He also served nine years in the Army, including a tour in Iraq from 2005-2006 advising the Iraqi police and courts. "I'm excited about this project. I think ‘Convictions' has the potential to become the destination on the Web for smart legal commentary," said Carter.

Website: www.slate.com/convictions

Copyright Infringement: Exceptions for Reproducing Photos & Films

The Australian Government is currently reviewing the operation of two copyright exceptions which permit photographs and cinematograph films to be copied in a different format for private use, subject to certain conditions. The act of making these copies would otherwise constitute copyright infringement.

Broadly speaking, under these copyright exceptions you are permitted to reproduce a photograph in hardcopy form in electronic form or reproduce a photograph in electronic form in hardcopy form (section 47J of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)). For example, it is permissible to print a paper copy from a digital photograph.

Under the current copyright exceptions, the owner of a video tape containing a cinematograph film in analogue form is also permitted to copy the film in electronic form for domestic use (section 110AA of the Copyright Act). For example, it is permissible for the owner of a VHS video cassette to make a digital copy of a film on a DVD or computer hard drive.

While these copyright exceptions are not new (they became effective on 11 December, 2006) a review of their operation is now being conducted.

An Issues Paper was recently circulated and interested persons were invited to make submissions addressing:

whether the copyright exceptions are operating satisfactorily and achieving their objectives; and

whether the copyright exceptions should be modified in some way.
With submissions closing at the end of February the copyright review is expected to be completed by March 31, 2008.

Website: http://www.davies.com.au/ip-copyright.aspx